The advantage of this solution is actually

shafi765@gmail.

Based on the above analysis, it can be seen that if the products and business models of multiple shippers are similar, a large number of repetitive operations will occur. At this time, if the warehouse still uses the multi-shipper model to manage, unnecessary costs will be increased and it will lead to to reduce efficiency. Therefore, this solution is more suitable for: Products with multiple owners have different business models, and it is hoped that they can be strictly differentiated and managed at the physical level in a business scenario. Many-to-one scenario After


analyzing the above one-on-one scenario, we can next look at Malaysia Phone Number Data what the many-on-one gameplay is like. There are still multiple cargo owners on ERP, but when signing a contract with an external warehouse, only one entity is signed, which is equivalent to having only one cargo owner on the warehouse side. This will create a many-to-one situation: ERP is a multi-shipper, and WMS is a single cargo owner .  the disadvantage of the "one-to-one scenario". It is suitable for: The products and business models of multiple





shippers are all the same. Basically, there is no need for special distinction at the business operation level. It is only the inventory distinction that needs to be made at the financial/accounting level. After adopting this solution, ERP can create orders and operate them according to the logic of multiple cargo owners, and then push them to WMS. WMS has only one cargo owner, only one operation logic and management requirements, which can effectively save operating costs and at the same time also Reduced some management complexity.